Comments on: TASOAE: 003

By: Raeny83

Raeny83 — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:30:28 +0000

The interesting thing about the SGA-Unity kerfuffle was always that they were willing to fund whatever budget we requested (no budget request was ever denied), but were not willing to recognize us as an official SGA club. We received over a grand in funding while I was president, but recognition as a student government club was never approved.

Go figure.

By: Lissa

Lissa — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:07:03 +0000

Oh, cool. I know who the secretary is, too. She did work on the Thorn during our time.

By: locallunatic

locallunatic — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:00:51 +0000

Not really sure they need that kind of funding though. I know I wrote like 2 checks at most for the year I was treasurer.

By: Gregory Weir

Gregory Weir — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:17:25 +0000

There is a difference between being an SGA club and being a recognized campus organization. Unity was always recognized by the administration and had an advisor; the question is SGA recognition and funding from the students’ activity fees.

By: trythil

trythil — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:58:41 +0000

It seems so; Holden’s their advisor. Cool dude.

http://www.rose-hulman.edu/Users/groups/Unity/index.html

By: Lissa

Lissa — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:35:47 +0000

Oh, the memories. I wonder if Unity ever became a club…