Tag Archives: pacifism

“The Ur Game” Released In Game Poems #1: First Moves

I’m honored to be part of the editorial collective for the first issue of Game Poems, an interactive magazine founded by Jordan Magnuson, who literally wrote the book on game poetry. The first issue collects 13 short, poetic video games that can all be played in your browser.

My contribution1 is “The Ur Game,” a puzzle about games, war, and the rules we choose to follow.

The theme for this issue was “First Moves,” and I explore both the experience of interacting with an unfamiliar game for the first time and the question of what we need to do in order to start to escape this broken system we live in.

You can play “The Ur Game” on Itch.io.

(We’re still working on some loading issues with the version of the game that’s included in the magazine. For now, the version on Itch will load much more reliably with less chance of making your browser unresponsive. I’ll try and remember to update this post once that issue is resolved!)

I initially designed “The Ur Game” last year at a time when the primary bit of world news on my mind was the ongoing genocide of Palestinians by the state of Israel. Now, my own country, the United States, has dramatically increased the pace of its genocidal campaigns against Latine people and is terrorizing its own residents with secret police. I hope the is less relevant to world events in another year.

Please check out the rest of the games in Game Poems #1! I think we selected a diverse and excellent selection of artsy games, and I hope that they help to expand your view of how games can work. And take a look at the Community Showcase, which collects submissions that didn’t end up in the issue! It was very hard picking just ten submissions to include, and the collection contains many excellent works.

Show 1 footnote
  1. Ten of the games were selected by the editors from an open request for submissions. Three, including mine, are invited submissions from established developers.

Punching Nazis Is a Sacred Act

Richard Spencer — a known racist and genocide advocate — got punched on video and publicly humiliated and it was funny and satisfying to watch. It was an effective way to weaken his public platform, both in an immediate sense (it silenced him mid-sentence) and in a long-term sense (he will always be the person with silly music behind videos of him being hurt). This has started a wave of public speech alternately condemning the specific act or advocating for eagerly and proactively punching more Nazis.

While there’s certainly been a range of viewpoints in this discussion, two common ways these ethics are being framed are1: “violence as political action is never acceptable” and “punching Nazis is always great so let’s do more of it.” I disagree with both of these ideas.

Violence is sometimes justified and even necessary. But it is a serious, severe, and indeed sacred act. When you commit violence in the defense of virtue, you are causing a feeling person pain, potentially permanently injuring or killing them, and you are taking the poison of that violence into yourself. It’s a transformative act, a sacrifice, and to take it lightly is not only reckless: it is sacrilege that minimizes that sacrifice.
Continue reading Punching Nazis Is a Sacred Act

Show 1 footnote

  1. along with disingenuous arguments that do things like evoke Martin Luther King without understanding his work or proposing elaborate counterfactuals